Thoughts on good and poor healthcare for urogynaecological conditions

This section covers:

  • Listening and being heard
  • The patient as a whole person
  • Kindness and respect
  • Being open-minded and collaborative
  • Building trust
  • Women’s healthcare and being gender inclusive
  • Making complaints

People we talked to saw ‘good’ healthcare as including access to treatments and information about urogynaecological conditions, as well as the values and characteristics associated with considerate and caring healthcare professionals. When healthcare professionals did not provide the best care, some suspected that this was due to services being under a lot of pressure, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Elisabeth is concerned that the NHS is “running on empty” and that healthcare professionals are doing their best under difficult circumstances.

Listening and being heard

Listening was regarded as a key skill for a ‘good’ healthcare professional. Julie, Melanie, Mary Y and others told us that they had to hunt to find someone who listened and understood and described the relief when they found the right person. For those, like Jenni and Susan, who had good experiences with healthcare professionals or with a particular doctor, nurse, or physiotherapist, this was valued. Mary X says her GP “never rushes you and he’s always friendly”.

Jan’s healthcare professional put her “at ease” and gave her enough time to hear and understand.

For Kerry, Jackie and others, good healthcare was about being heard and taken seriously, even when symptoms were not considered life threatening. Gwen felt listened to and supported by her GP who she felt would leave no “stone unturned”.

In contrast, Sue Y felt that she had been treated as if it was “only a little prolapse”, and Jackie thought there was a “blasé attitude” to her unexplained symptoms following mesh surgery. After feeling dismissed by a doctor, Cynthia put off seeking medical help again and, when she did return, felt scolded for not having come back sooner.

Janet, Carole, and others told us that good healthcare involved professionals recognising the impact of symptoms on a person’s life. Alaina, Eve and Gwen would like them to always remember that “it’s a big thing” to talk about basic body functions such as urine, faeces, and sex.

Alaina felt that no one had really understood the impact of having a prolapse.

The patient as a whole person

Georgina, Amy, Jenni, and Alice, described ‘good’ care as focusing on the person as a whole, rather than as a symptom, body part or diagnosis. Katy said that it is important not to put patients’ symptoms “in a box” so that they can see “a whole person, not just this ailment”.

This meant also considering the connections between a person’s urogynaecological symptoms, other health and life issues, emotional wellbeing, and impacts on the quality of life. Felicity, who had a prolapse, felt her physiotherapist had taken a holistic approach to her care. In contrast, there had been times when Penny and Phoebe had felt treated like a “slab of meat” rather than as a person. Vicky would like them to “look beyond the guidelines” and treat the individual person.

Sue Y worries that the health system focuses on body parts and not on people and thinks it’s important for healthcare professionals to learn about communication and relationships.

Healthcare professionals who had recognised the women’s emotional needs and wider life concerns were appreciated. Phoebe told us how important it was for her when the physiotherapist really considered the demands of being a new mum for example by recognising that “you can’t tell a mum not to pick up a car seat”. After Eve spoke to a physiotherapist about the emotional impacts of her prolapse, she felt that “a little weight had been lifted off my shoulders”. Carole felt treated as a whole person when her A&E doctor took the time to listen and get her a cup of tea.

Freia would give her nurse a ‘gold star’ for being so caring.

Elly thinks that taking the time to understand what someone is going through is an important part of healthcare as “we are not a problem in a medical book”.

Kindness and respect

Chloe said that her urogynaecologist had a “kindness in her voice”. Mary Y described a nurse who “had a very special way of supporting patients just by gentle touch, just a touch on the shoulder”. Vickie appreciated that her consultant would “hold my hand when I cried my eyes out and I think he absolutely recognised the impact it was having”.

Jordan feels that good health care is a “combination of kindness” and caring enough to “get to the bottom of what’s going on”.

In contrast, some recalled experiences when they felt healthcare professionals had been indifferent or dismissive. Jackie felt that her healthcare professional “wasn’t interested”, Rowan could not understand “why people have to be rude”, and Phyllis felt like she was seen as “a bit of a nuisance”. Negative experiences included practitioners who were “arrogant”, “cocky”, or “rude”. This made it difficult to seek treatment for conditions that can be difficult to talk about.

Some people said that their healthcare professionals had used disrespectful language to discuss their bodies. Kezia suggested that they should be “better trained in empathetic language”. Fiona felt that they should be careful what they say, particularly if they don’t always know what someone has already been through. Catherine said that she “really warmed to” a physiotherapist who made her “feel comfortable”, whereas she had seen another she could not ‘connect’ with. Iris told us that she only “really opened up to a healthcare professional” about her traumatic experiences when she met one that she really trusted.

Cynthia describes her experiences of a gynaecologist who used the word “disgusting” when examining her. After a series of bad encounters with healthcare professionals about her prolapse she received ‘compassionate care’

Many, including Leeanne and Katy, said that good healthcare was also sometimes about practitioners’ personalities and how they engaged with patients, including communication styles. Sometimes, the way healthcare professionals delivered information and the language they used could be confusing. Susan thinks that using “layman’s terms” can help patients better understand their conditions. Jo considers it important that healthcare practitioners communicate information “in a way that can be understood by everyone of all abilities”.

María, who is studying as an overseas student in the UK, says that language can be a barrier in healthcare for those whose home language is not English.

Being open-minded and collaborative

A ‘good’ healthcare professional was seen as someone who kept their mind ‘open’ to treatment options and the causes of health problems. Alice, Pauline and Melanie and others told us about healthcare professionals who would “fight your corner”, go out “on a limb”, or stick their necks out to help. Fran appreciated the consultant who stood up for her when other doctors didn’t believe that her bladder had been damaged by mesh.

In contrast, Laura, Jenny, Katy, and others felt that some healthcare professionals did not want to listen to anyone else’s ideas about cause or treatment, and could be “arrogant”, “paternalistic”, or “patronising”. Sue Y said her doctor had a “have you been on the internet again?” attitude.

Anna has felt that there is a barrier when she tries to share what she knows about UTI with a healthcare professional. She would like them to acknowledge where there is no medical certainty.

Several, including Susan, Fran, Jamie, and Vicky, who all had urinary incontinence, felt “signed off” or “cast adrift” with symptoms that had not been explained. Jamie, Susan, Penny, and others felt “left with the responsibility” of having to deal with problems following mesh surgery. Anna wonders why a healthcare professional would have “no interest or curiosity” to find out why her UTIs persisted.

Mehar feels that healthcare professionals need to think “outside the box” and consider what might be causing ongoing symptoms.

Carole, Penny, Phyllis, and Gwen said that some doctors they had seen would “just make up their minds” or follow a “set of rules”. Julie told us that her doctors “zoned in on” her history of postnatal depression rather than looking at her current symptoms. Rebecca, who ended up in hospital with a kidney infection, wants healthcare professionals to be more questioning about diagnostic tests for UTI.

Leah appreciates that it is difficult to ‘unlearn’ what has been taught, but would like healthcare professionals to be open to the possibility that tests for UTI are not always accurate.

We heard positive stories about healthcare professionals working alongside their patients to find solutions. Iris felt that it was “incredibly powerful” to be ‘put in charge’ by her physiotherapist. Rebecca described “amazing healthcare” with her GP, where they were both “trying to muddle through it together”. Melanie’s private GP was receptive and worked with her to find the right HRT option. Georgina said that her healthcare professional had heard what she had to say and talked to her “like an equal”.

Janet is pleased that she was treated in a “holistic” way which included physiotherapy and pelvic floor exercises amongst other things.

Trust and feeling safe

Many of those we spoke to, including Leeanne, felt that trust was at the heart of ‘good’ healthcare. Phoebe has found that there are “extremes in the quality of care” and has been left “wary of the medical profession” by some negative experiences.

Sophie, Leeanne, Susan, Julie, and others who had complications following mesh surgery felt that they had not been fully informed, or even had been ‘misinformed’, about potential complications.

Katy used to have the utmost faith in the medical profession before her mesh surgery. Her lost trust has had a big effect on all future dealings with healthcare as she no longer knows who to believe.


Informed consent was seen as essential to good healthcare delivery, but Katy and Jackie were unsatisfied with the level of information they received about different treatment options. Penny felt that she had been unfairly “sold” mesh surgery. Following her hysterectomy, Gwen does not remember being informed that her ovaries were being removed.

Jamie, Sian and others described privacy and confidentiality as important aspects of good healthcare. Jamie had felt upset when she experienced urinary incontinence in hospital after surgery and felt a nurse who came to help her had “broadcast it to the whole ward”. Leeanne thought it had been ‘unprofessional’ to pass on details without asking when she had chosen to seek care privately. Katy felt “completely humiliated” to think that doctors had talked to each other about her.

Emma says that you wouldn’t tell people your personal problems in a supermarket queue, so staff should be aware of privacy in an open hospital ward.

Women’s healthcare and being gender inclusive

Helen, Kerry, Carole, and Jenny expressed the view that women were not always taken as seriously as men in healthcare. Katy, and others, felt that ‘women’s problems’ were seen as a bit of a “joke”. Jane was deeply concerned about sexism and ageism in healthcare, and said that it is “shockingly bad that women’s bodies are not treated more seriously”.

Carole says that doctors are dismissive of women’s symptoms, and feels that men’s complaints are taken more seriously.

Kezia and Sharon, who developed prolapse after giving birth, felt that their needs were sometimes neglected because there was more focus on their babies’ health. Sharon emphasised the need for more post-partum care services and greater awareness of (and the availability of self-referral to) pelvic floor physiotherapy services. Jane and others felt that women’s bodies were sometimes written off as being ‘prone to’ bladder, bowel, and pelvic problems. In some people’s negative experiences of healthcare, their symptoms were regarded as the result of getting older, being menopausal, or as a standard outcome of having a baby.

Iris thinks that sometimes women’s health problems are dismissed by healthcare professionals.

Jane and Rowan want healthcare professionals to recognise that women have experience of their own body and that they are not just “imagining things”. Janet “would have expected better” understanding from a female doctor, as did Jane when seeking advice about how to manage her sex life. Eve felt that medical letters did not always reflect her memory of a consultation and this has made her doubt herself and wonder if she has given the wrong impression by looking “brighter” than she was feeling about her prolapse. Iris was surprised to find she had depression on her medical record, which she feared “might work against me” when seeing healthcare professionals.

Many people we talked to, including Fran, Holly, and Megan, said that they had been made to feel “hysterical”, to think that “it’s all in your head”, and that they were making a fuss. Jamie felt that her doctor was “very dubious” that her symptoms were caused by mesh surgery. Sue Y, a healthcare professional herself, felt dismissed and that she was seen as “making a fuss” when she said her pessary was painful.

Mehar says that healthcare professionals have tried to make her feel that her symptoms are in her head. She thinks that better communication is key to good healthcare.

For transgender or non-binary people, good medical care involves an additional set of health needs. For Jordan, who is non-binary, using the right pronouns and not making assumptions about gender identity were important markers of respectful medical care. Jordan feels that while it can be “tough to address the balance”, it is important to support reproductive and gynaecological healthcare needs while being gender inclusive.

Jordan’s gender identity has been a barrier to efficient care. They think that “speaking to the person and understanding their situation” is often all that is need to better accommodate gender non-conforming patients.

Making complaints

Amy, Helen and Catherine had all made complaints based on their healthcare experiences and seeing healthcare professionals who had not seemed very supportive or informed. A few others, like Laura, Eve and Phoebe, had intended to but decided against it. Laura explained that “it’s been such a slog of going through the whole various healthcare system parts and I just haven’t felt up to getting more entangled in it”. Alice gave informal feedback in the hope it would improve things for other patients in the future.

Some of those who we talked to felt that taking part in this study to make an information and support resource was another way to make a difference to others, including by sharing their messages for other people affected by urogynaecological conditions.