This film is a ‘catalyst film’ – a short video that is intended to spark discussion between patients, community members, NHS staff, service managers, and commissioners about how they can jointly improve people’s experience and health outcomes. It could be used as part of experience-based co-design (EBCD) activities for service improvement.
For more information about this patient-centred quality improvement process, please use the online toolkit by searching for Point of Care Foundation EBCD Toolkit.
The film is 21 minutes and 26 seconds long, and it is made up of the following topics:
• Experiences of living with urogynaecological conditions (starting at 1m 59s)
• Interactions with healthcare professionals (starting at 6m 18s)
• Engaging with the healthcare system (starting at 11m 7s)
• Things that have brought people help and hope (starting at 17m 58s)
You can show the full film in one go, or you may prefer to show each part of the film in turn followed by, for example, a discussion or break.
If you are showing the film as part of a group activity, we suggest that the person facilitating the viewing uses the following opening script to frame the video:
Thank you for joining us to watch this film. This film was designed on the analysis of 74 interviews with people talking about their experiences of living with urogynaecological symptoms and using health services for these conditions. The interviews were conducted and analysed by a team from the University of Oxford, and represent the experiences of people living with urogynaecological conditions from across the United Kingdom. Some of the people interviewed preferred us to show excerpts from their interview on video, some on audio, and some written only or spoken by actors. The video clips included speak to an individual person’s experience but were selected because they represent wider themes that emerged from the whole collection of interviews.
The interviews collected information about people’s experiences of living with urogynaecological conditions, seeking healthcare, and the impact of their condition on the personal and social lives. See
more interviews about urogynaecological conditions.
Clips were selected for this film that the researchers felt would help spark discussion about how healthcare and people’s experiences could be improved, through better understanding how people have experienced their conditions and their healthcare journeys.
Some of the experiences included in this film were very positive and some were more challenging. There are times when people are sad or angry about what has happened to them, because it can be distressing to have and seek support for urogynaecological conditions. You will hear some examples of negative experiences, which are shared in the hope that a lot can be learnt from looking at when things go wrong and considering what could be done differently to make for a better experience. Listen out also for positive experiences and views, including where people remember a small act of kindness or a particularly good moment that made all the difference to them.
Some of the experiences that you hear may resonate with you and others may feel that they do not apply to you, your local area or service. The intention is that by hearing these people’s experiences and being given a space to reflect on your own views and experiences, it may spark some ideas about what could be done differently and what you can strive to continue doing. These changes may be ones you can make for yourself or on behalf of your team, or changes that could be possible with the support of others, such as healthcare professionals, service managers, commissioners or patient groups, in order to improve healthcare experiences for people with urogynaecological conditions.
Thank you to everyone who participated in the study and shared their experience with us, and to the patients, members of the public and healthcare professionals who helped develop the catalyst film. With special thanks to Dr Lucy Frost for leading the development of the catalyst film, Professor Louise Locock for guidance on the process, and Ruth Sanders for cutting and editing the catalyst film.
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (NIHR202450). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, including the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation and review of this catalyst film.