Julie – Interview 13

Julie volunteered to take part in a clinical trial, the EAT study, looking at babies and young children developing food intolerances. Julie did not qualify and was turned down. Although disappointed, Julie is very supportive of clinical trials in general.

Julie, aged 45 years, lives with her husband and son aged three months. Julie responded to an advert in the Bounty e-mail newsletter inviting mothers of babies under the age of three months to take part in the EAT study looking at babies and young children developing food intolerances. Because Julie experiences mild food intolerances, the study was of interest to her. The criteria for taking part included babies less than three months old, babies had to be completely breastfed and mother and baby had to be able to travel to London once a year. Unfortunately Julie did not meet the criteria and was thus not eligible to take part. Because her son had three bottles of formula when in hospital, this disqualified him from taking part. Julie’s disappointment at this reflects her personal interest in the study. Julie had hoped that the trial would be of use to her and her son because of her own mild food intolerances and would help to manage her son’s weaning and diet. However, Julie recognises the need for having inclusion and exclusion criteria and is very supportive of clinical trials in general. She says

My husband and I are academics and so we believe in putting back into the system and we know that researchers are very often short of subjects and so we like to help if we can. I;ve been a blood donor all of my adult life, I;ve benefitted from medical science myself and so it’s a way of putting back into the system

However, in terms of putting her son forward for a clinical trial, this would depend on the amount of discomfort for him and the potential side effects and risks involved. Thus, she would be less inclined to consent for her son to take part in a trial that required some level of physical discomfort. She recognises the difference between volunteering herself to volunteering her own son. However, Julie would encourage her older children to take part if they wanted to and explain to them that there may not be any personal benefit rather it may benefit somebody else in the future.

If Julie could change one thing about her experiences in taking part in clinical trials, she says that one of the reasons for taking part in trials is her interest in the area, so for her it would be good to be given a summary of the results at the end of the study. In giving advice to other parents, Julie says

Because there are still so many things which affect our children very, very seriously and so if we can contribute to that research and it helps kids, it helps keep our children and the children of future generations more healthy then we should consider can I help, can I volunteer my child to help with that

Helping other children and helping increase knowledge are good reasons for considering to enrol…

Age at interview 45

Gender Female

Even though Julies son was not eligible to take part in a trial, she would consider another…

Age at interview 45

Gender Female

Julie would support her son if he wanted to take part in a trial in the future, and explain that…

Age at interview 45

Gender Female

When your child does not meet the inclusion criteria to take part in a clinical trial, it can be…

Age at interview 45

Gender Female