Fern

In 2010, Fern was about to give birth to their first child when her partner had a cardiac arrest that left him severely brain injured. He was only 28 years old. Fern fought hard to ensure he would get every intervention and have a chance to recover. However, she has now thinks continuing to subject him to life-prolonging interventions is cruel and pointless.

In 2010 when Fern was about to give birth to their first child, Fern’s partner became very ill from an unknown cause, and had seizures and then a cardiac arrest. He was resuscitated and rushed to intensive care but never regained full consciousness. There were periods when he seemed to be making some recovery and isolated moments when he was able to utter some words – he once shouted “Go away!”, and another time called out Fern’s name.

When we first interviewed Fern in 2012 she was focussed on trying to ensure that her partner would receive all life-sustaining treatments: “As long as he is fighting, we will fight with him.” She was also determined to explore all avenues for recovery, which included different experimental drug treatments and deep brain stimulation.

Nothing seemed to work apart from his seizures decreasing: “The only major change has been deterioration over time.” When we met with Fern again to film her for healthtalk.org in 2014 it was 4 years after her partner first collapsed. She now thinks that he is on the borderline between vegetative and minimally conscious and believes that “he has had enough” and he should be allowed to die. Fern says she can barely remember her partner now, after everything she has been through over the last four years, and that “My most profound connection with him has come since his injuries. I love him more now than I ever did before.”

Her partner is on a palliative care pathway, but is continuing to receive artificial nutrition and hydration. Fern describes the hospice care as fantastic and feels he is now being kept as comfortable as is possible. Although he has been close to death many times, he continues to survive. Fern would like to see more accurate media images of coma and severe brain injury. She also wants to see a society that is more accepting of death and dying and does not promote “life at all cost”.

Fern’s partner has been close to death several times. She wishes they would not keep putting his feeding tube back in.

Gender Female

Fern talks about the window of opportunity that clinicians may need to take.

Gender Female

Fern talks about the change from her view a few years prior that everything should be done to keep her partner alive, to now believing it would be better if he died.

Gender Female

Fern is pleased her partner is now on a palliative care pathway. She describes end of life care in a positive way when compared with aggressive life sustaining treatments.

Gender Female

Fern says realise that the future may not be what you hope for, and don’t assume your family will be the miracle. She also says she does not think myself back then’ would listen to what she now knows.

Gender Female

When Fern visits her partner she now feels: hes not there. A body is there. That is it. But she still finds it hard to detach.

Gender Female

Fern thinks keeping her partner alive now is inhumane. She would not want that for herself and, above all, would not want to put her family through it.

Gender Female

In her second interview Fern reflected on the decision to remove DNAR from her partner’s records, and the consequences this had.

Gender Female

Fern originally insisted on aggressive treatment for all her partner’s infection, sometimes in the face of medical advice. However, now she thinks he had had enough’, but still found that a very hard thing to say.

Gender Female

It was a relief for Fern when a decision was taken not to treat her partner in future.

Gender Female

Fern talks about how much she prefers it that her partner is treated at the nursing home.

Gender Female

Fern feels that some clinicians were reluctant to tell her the truth and that false hope led to her partner being subject to futile treatment.

Gender Female

Fern describes how her partner did appear to be suffering before he was given ongoing long-term pain relief. Since he has been administered pain relief she has noticed that he appears more relaxed and not in pain.

Gender Female

Fern is pleased with the hospice involvement in her partner’s care.

Gender Female

Fern’s partner was meant to be for Do Not Resuscitate and No return to intensive care, but she successfully challenged both decisions.

Gender Female

Fern does not think her partner feels pain

Gender Female