Family Experiences of Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States

Family experiences of applying to court for treatment withdrawal

We spoke to several families where a legal application had been made to allow the feeding tube (artificial nutrition and hydration) to be withdrawn. The court approved the application in every case where the patient was confirmed to be in a permanent vegetative state.

These family members praised the clarity of legal procedures and the skill and compassion of many of the health professionals who came to do expert clinical assessments and the legal professionals involved in the case. They were grateful for efforts to reduce the strain on families. But they also highlight some challenges. 

Here, Helen, Gunars, Margaret, and Cathy share their practical or emotional experience of going to court. They have quite different experiences depending on the clinical team and when their case happened. The court case for Cathy’s brother was in 1998, the case for Helen’s son was heard in 2010 and for Gunars’ sister in 2013. They tell their stories in the hope of supporting other families and helping to improve the system.
In 2013 new National clinical guidelines were issued addressing some of the concerns raised by Helen, Gunars, Margaret and Cathy. The guidelines (RCP, 2013) outline the responsibility of the Trust or Clinical Commissioning Group to take the initiative in making an application to the court and specify the timescale for doing this. (See ‘Resources’)

Feedback

Please use the form below to tell us what you think of the site. We’d love to hear about how we’ve helped you, how we could improve or if you have found something that’s broken on the site.

Make a Donation to healthtalk.org





Find out more about how you can help us.

Send to a friend

Simply fill out this form and we'll send them an email