Penile Cancer

Considering complementary and experimental treatments

Complementary approaches to dealing with cancer have been less thoroughly tested than conventional medicines. They have no proven effect on cancer growth, but they seem to help many people to cope with feelings of stress, anxiety and depression, and make people feel better. Some may also help to reduce particular side effects. Relaxation techniques are now often part of conventional support for many patients and are increasingly being offered free at cancer treatment and support centres and at hospices, as part of a psychological approach to learning how to manage with the stress of cancer.
 
Because some complementary therapies may be inappropriate for people with particular types of cancer or those having a specific treatment, people with cancer should discuss complementary therapies with their hospital specialist before having them.
 
Only a few of the men we spoke to considered complementary therapies because surgery was presented as the most effective treatment. While Jim believes that complementary therapies can help, he didn’t consider them on this occasion as he was most concerned about how much of his penis he was going to lose through surgery.
As the word 'complementary' suggests, health professionals recommend that these approaches should be considered an addition to and not a substitute for conventional medical treatment. However, sometimes people choose to use therapies or dietary supplements as an alternative to conventional treatment.
Although research shows that eating a healthy diet can reduce the risk of developing certain types of cancer, so far there is no scientific evidence suggesting that following any particular diet, dietary supplement, or avoidance of certain elements of a diet can treat cancer or prevent it coming back.
 
Experimental treatments are used in what are called ‘clinical trials’, which are research studies involving people. They test how well particular treatments work and whether they are safe. Unless people take part in well-designed trials, doctors do not have enough evidence to know if a treatment is both effective and safe. Without trials, there is a risk that people will be given treatments which do not work and which may even do harm. Just because a treatment is new and is undergoing a trial does not mean it is necessarily better than existing treatments, and it may have bad side effects.
 
None of the men interviewed were invited to try experimental treatments or take part in a trial, although many said they would have considered this if offered. Rodger and Jim said they would have tried anything if it meant they could avoid surgery. Rodger and Frosty said they would have followed their consultant’s advice about whether they should get involved in an experimental treatment and Mick would take part if the doctors said it was in his best interest. Michael said it was unlikely he would have agreed to an experimental treatment; he would have ‘chickened out’ and gone for surgery.
 
For further information on clinical trials see the Medical research section.

Last reviewed January 2015.
Last updated January 2015.

Feedback

Please use the form below to tell us what you think of the site. We’d love to hear about how we’ve helped you, how we could improve or if you have found something that’s broken on the site.

Make a Donation to healthtalk.org





Find out more about how you can help us.

Send to a friend

Simply fill out this form and we'll send them an email